Identifying dentists' attitudes towards prevention guidance using Q-sort methodology.

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the attitudes and motivating factors of dentists working in the English National Health Service (NHS) towards prevention guidance. DESIGN: Q-methodology: an established hybrid quantitative/qualitative technique used in the social sciences to categorise subjects based on their views by considering factors as part of their overall decision-making profile. SETTING: General Dental Practices offering care under an NHS contract. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: NHS dentists (n = 26) placed 36 statements about prevention guidance derived from an earlier study into a distribution grid that ranked the statements from "most agree" to "most disagree". Principal components factor analysis was applied to determine the principal patterns in the rankings of statements. RESULTS: Analysis indicated a total of six distinct profiles within the responses, of which three profiles had at least six dentists loading onto them. The first profile was strongly characterised by dentists who appear motivated to provide prevention but financial and time constraints prevent them from doing so. The second was characterised by dentists using prevention guidance but restricting its use to only certain patients. The third was characterised by dentists who appeared "health-focused". They placed importance on working to prevention guidance, but were keen to have greater patient and professional support in achieving this. CONCLUSION: In this group of dentists Q-methodology identified three main profiles to the delivery of prevention guidance.

Barriers and facilitators that influence the delivery of prevention guidance in health service dental practice: a questionnaire study of practising dentists in Southwest England.

UNLABELLED: Objective: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the barriers and facilitators influencing the delivery of prevention in accordance with a national guideline (Delivering Better Oral Health, Department of Health England) in health service dental practice. DESIGN: Self-completion questionnaire. SETTING: Health service general dental practices. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were sent via two mailings to all 508 dentists registered to work in health service general dental practice in Devon, South West England. RESULTS: In total 266 questionnaires were returned (52% response rate). Examples of barriers and facilitators were evident at various organisational levels of dentistry. These were principally the healthcare system, practice (dental office) arrangements and professional factors. Respondents gave positive responses to questions concerning the flexibility (53%) and benefit of the guideline (63%) and they tended to indicate that they didn't perceive problems in changing their old routines (58%). Opinion was divided among respondents on whether they felt patients followed their advice (49%). There was overall agreement that delivering prevention in practice is problematic if there are insufficient staff (68%), facilities (53%) and time (60%). Encouragingly most respondents felt adequately trained to deliver the evidence based prevention guidance (59%). CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified some barriers and facilitators to the delivery of prevention guidance in this group of health service dentists with no single factor viewed consistently as more important than any others. A further qualitative study is planned to investigate in more depth the reasons underpinning the responses given in this study.